Client Experiences
What Clients Observe About the Work
Accounts from developers, contractors, and project managers who have engaged Saraburi Lex across different project stages in Thailand.
Back to HomeClient Reviews
From the Project Team's Perspective
Pairat Charoensuk
Project Director — Civil Contractor, Saraburi Province
"The pre-tender review identified two clauses we would have missed entirely under bid time pressure. The LD cap was set at a level we could not price around — knowing that before submission changed our decision on whether to bid at all. The memorandum was clear enough that the whole bid team could read and understand it."
March 2025 — Pre-Tender Review
Suchada Thamrongwat
Legal Manager — Developer, Nakhon Ratchasima
"We used the contract drafting service for a FIDIC Yellow Book adaptation on a design-build project. The Thai mandatory law review of the special conditions was exactly what we needed — our in-house team had been working from an English-language template that included some provisions unenforceable under Thai law. The parallel Thai version saved us significant coordination time."
February 2025 — Contract Drafting
Nopporn Klongkum
Commercial Manager — Main Contractor, Lopburi
"We were three months into an EOT claim and uncertain about our documentary position before we engaged for the claim assessment. The assessment was methodical — it identified where our contemporaneous records supported the claim and where the notice timing created procedural difficulty. That was more useful than a confident assertion one way or the other."
January 2025 — Claim Counsel
Wanchai Amornpong
Finance Director — Project Lender, Bangkok
"Our credit team needed a review of the construction contract package as part of pre-drawdown due diligence. The contract drafting service was adapted for our lender position rather than just the project parties. The summary written for the non-legal reader was the most practical part — it gave the credit committee exactly what they needed without requiring them to read the full contract analysis."
March 2025 — Contract Review (Lender)
Ratchanee Photisat
Contracts Manager — Subcontractor, Ayutthaya
"We were reviewing a subcontract package under a Silver Book main contract and were unsure about the flow-down of risk from the employer terms. The pre-tender review flagged several indemnity provisions that were significantly wider than standard FIDIC terms. At ฿4,200 it was the most cost-effective risk management step we took on that bid."
February 2025 — Pre-Tender Review
Boonlert Sirikul
Site Director — Developer, Saraburi
"Having an office in Saraburi rather than Bangkok made a practical difference for us. We could meet in person without either party travelling several hours, which matters when you are working through contract documentation that requires discussion rather than just email exchange. The work was careful and the delivery was on schedule."
April 2025 — Contract Drafting
Case Studies
Engagement Summaries
Three representative engagement types, described in general terms to illustrate the scope and outcome of each service area.
Challenge
Industrial Plant — FIDIC Yellow Book Adaptation
A developer preparing a design-build contract for an industrial plant in central Thailand was using a FIDIC Yellow Book template previously adapted for a project in Singapore. Several special conditions were not suited to Thai mandatory law provisions, and no parallel Thai version had been prepared.
Approach
The contract drafting service was engaged. Special conditions were reviewed clause by clause against Thai Civil and Commercial Code provisions. Eight clauses were identified as requiring adaptation. Payment milestone and performance bond provisions were restructured to reflect Thai market practice. A parallel Thai-language version was prepared.
Outcome
The adapted contract was executed within the project's pre-construction timeline. The developer's project team had a Thai-language version available for use with contractors and subcontractors throughout the project. The review of eight special conditions avoided provisions that would have been unenforceable under Thai law.
Timeline: 18 working days · Fee: ฿32,500
Challenge
Road Infrastructure — EOT Claim Assessment
A main contractor on a road infrastructure project had submitted an extension of time claim under a FIDIC Red Book contract. The employer's project manager had rejected the claim on documentary grounds. The contractor was uncertain whether the rejection was justified or whether the claim could be advanced through the FIDIC dispute mechanism.
Approach
The claim counsel service was engaged. Project records, daily site reports, correspondence, and the original claim submission were reviewed against the FIDIC notice and contemporaneous record requirements. The assessment identified that the primary notice had been served within the contractual time limit but that the contemporaneous records did not fully support the quantum of delay asserted.
Outcome
The assessment memorandum was used by the contractor's commercial team to revise the claim to a substantiated scope, which was subsequently accepted in part by the project manager. The DAAB step was not required. The contractor avoided the cost of formal dispute proceedings on a claim where the documentary basis was partial.
Timeline: 10 working days · Fee: ฿16,800
Challenge
Industrial Facility — Pre-Tender Contract Review
A specialist subcontractor was considering tendering for a mechanical and electrical package under a Silver Book main contract for an industrial facility. The bid team had limited experience with Silver Book risk allocation and was uncertain about the liability position on defects after practical completion.
Approach
The pre-tender review service was engaged. The flagging memorandum identified the Silver Book's employer-favourable risk allocation on force majeure, the extended defects liability period, and an indemnity clause that significantly extended the subcontractor's liability beyond the standard FIDIC scope. The LD structure was also flagged as uncapped.
Outcome
The bid team adjusted its pricing to reflect the extended DLP and uncapped LD exposure. The subcontractor also used the memorandum as the basis for a set of tender clarification questions to the main contractor. The bid was submitted with pricing that reflected the actual risk, rather than the standard package rates.
Timeline: 6 working days · Fee: ฿4,200
Practice Record
At a Glance
80+
Contracts Reviewed
4.8
Average Rating
฿2.4B
Project Value Covered
3
FIDIC Suite Editions
Contact Details
Phone
+66 36 583 7194Address
263 Phahonyothin Road, Pak Phriao, Mueang, Saraburi 18000
Office Hours
Mon–Fri: 9:00–17:30
Sat: 9:00–12:00
Next Step
Begin Your Engagement
A brief description of the contract situation or project matter is sufficient to confirm which service applies and outline the engagement process.
Request Counsel